Standards Director Nick Puschak is restarting the API subcommittee to consider phase 2 development tasks. If you would like to participate in the subcommittee, contact LOC here.
In 2020 the LEDES Oversight Committee is focusing on usability. In this regard, we are working toward releasing versions of the UTBMS code sets better suited for use in non-US legal proceedings, meaning that we want to create versions containing descriptive language as opposed to using US-oriented legal procedural terms. Once this is complete, we will then translate the UTBMS documents into simplified Chinese, traditional Spanish, Arabic, traditional Portuguese, Russian, Japanese, German, French and Italian.
This project is being led by Director Jim Hannigan and is expected to take a year to complete. One hurdle in this project is that many code sets were ratified by organizations other than the LEDES Oversight Committee, and we need their approval to move ahead with altering their original material.
Our intention is to hire a legal translation company to assist with the translation. A member law firm has already agreed to help approve the Chinese translations, to ensure everything makes sense before it is published. Can you help us? If so, please contact us using this link.
The LEDES Oversight Committee has formalized an ad-hoc project to address situations where third party ebilling system processes are contrary to specifications in the LEDES format documentation. Our goal is to work one-on-one with vendors to align their processes with the standards documentation, to eliminate exceptions and make legal ebilling less complicated than it is today.
To this end, we invite the legal community to report situations where vendor usage of the LEDES standards does not align with the format specification documents.
No, we don’t mean what you don’t like, or what you find annoying. We want to know specific functionality associated with LEDES invoice files that is just contrary to how the format is written. Here are a couple of examples:
- A vendor requires a tax code on every LEDES 98BI line item instead of just those that are taxable.
- A vendor does not allow for taxes to be assessed at the matter/invoice level.
In both situations above, we reached out to the vendors to indicate that their process is contrary to how the LEDES standard is written. It can take months for the vendor to deploy a corrected process (both of the above are likely still in the correction process), so patience is needed.
You can submit information on non-compliance processes here.
From Subcommittee Chair and LEDES Vice President Cathi Collins:
The Error Codes Subcommittee of the LEDES Oversight Committee is pleased to put before the membership Phase 1 of the proposed Standard Error Codes for public comment. The need for these codes has been apparent to our law firm members for many years as they struggle to work within the parameters of numerous marketplace systems to accommodate their clients. Each legal ebilling system and client implementation has their own unique error messages or codes, some more explanatory than others. These variations require hours to track down the source of the errors (i.e., what and where to correct) in the submitted invoice.
With a LEDES Error Code standard, the source of errors can be quickly identified as the message and codes will be uniform across all systems. Further, the LEDES API proposed standard will utilize these Standard Error Codes as part of the API information exchange.
This project will take the form of 3 phases and this is Phase 1 (basic errors). Phase 2 will endeavor to expand to cover the more intricate tax structures we encounter in today’s billing landscape. Phase 3 will facilitate more advanced errors and client requirements and will endeavor to advise, in addition to inform.
The proposed codes presented here attempt to address the majority of basic errors and issues encountered during invoice submittal.
With the submission of this Phase 1 of the Error Codes, our Subcommittee has a unique opportunity to author an article relative to the implementation and use of the codes in ILTA’s Peer to Peer publication and we would like that article to feature the first vendor legal billing system to incorporate these Error Codes in their system.
This survey will close on 18 October 2019.
The 2019 LEDES Oversight Committee Board of Directors has been seated. Our leadership includes:
President – Jane A. Bennitt, Global Legal Ebilling, LLC
Vice President – Cathrine J. Collins, Legal Systems Automation, LLC
Treasurer/Membership – Jim Hannigan, Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis
Secretary – Nadia Strobbia, Thomson Reuters
Standards – Nicholas Puschak, Mitratech
Regional Groups – Andrew Dey, Andrew Dey Limited
Marketing – Rich Young, LegalKaizen
The LEDES Oversight Committee is pleased to announce that we have added instructional videos to our YouTube Channel on how to create and edit LEDES 98B and 98BI files. Featuring our Standards Director, Nicholas Puschak, these videos provide instruction for people new to legal ebilling on how to get started. These videos join our earlier presentation introducing the IPMM Invention Disclosure Schema created by Robin Hunziker, who leads that subcommittee. You can find our videos on YouTube by searching for LEDES Oversight Committee, or on the pages for each of these data exchange formats on this web site.
The Board of Directors is pleased to announce that forum functionality, intended to facilitate ebilling problem solving and information sharing, has been added for member use only. With membership in the LEDES Oversight Committee costing only $95 USD/year, this new benefit makes membership a bargain!
Aileen Leventon and Jenny Anne Horst-Martz, long-standing contributors to legal industry initiatives, have written another practical book on how to get the most out of using UTBMS codes. Legal Value Track is for both law firms and their clients, to advance the goal of developing a shared understanding on the value of particular legal services.
Legal Value Track provides buyers of legal services insight on the challenges law firms face in billing and pricing. Timekeeping practices and data bases on the costs and pricing of comparable matters require practical guidance on implementation. Outside counsel guidelines often don’t go far enough to address the actions required by individual lawyers and other timekeepers. This book does.
Legal Value Track is available on amazon.com as a paperback and an e-book. It is a companion to the manual the authors published last year on best practices in using codes in M&A transactions.
The LEDES Board of Directors has authorized the creation of an API Development Subcommittee, with Nicholas Puschak and Daniel Bodner serving as co-chairs. The subcommittee will develop and publish a software API that will enable direct application-to-application exchange of legal invoices and other information. The goal of this subcommittee is to define an industry standard REST Software API specification that will allow law firm time and billing applications to communicate directly to the corporate legal department matter management and e-billing applications, allowing law firm users to simply work within their time and billing applications to view the status of an invoice and to submit invoices, accruals and other legal data, eliminating the need to manually create and upload LEDES files to various systems. Participation in this effort is limited to LOC members. For more information, email us using the Contact LOC feature here.